This results in greater braking distances and overall lower traction of the tire on-road. On-Road Traction ComparisonĪT2 has wider grooves due to widely spaced tread blocks that allow a limited contact between tread and road hence limiting the grip of the tire to a minimum. The high rolling resistance and treadwear drastically decrease its durability and in turn, allow lower mileage. It has lower built strength compared to its counterpart, this decreases its treadwear resistance despite having Silica tread compound used in its treads. However, its ice traction is better due to higher contact patch and deep sipes which allow a good grip on slippery roads. Its stone ejectors are also not bold enough to efficiently eject all stone. The soft snow, mud, and gravel traction of the respective tire is bad as narrow grooves don’t allow efficient removal, causing the tire to lose grip. The tire compromises on wet traction as it has narrow grooves and fewer sipes which are not sufficient for effective passing of water and may cause hydroplaning. Its design is focused to provide better on-road traction. Its noise cancellation is not so great on-road due to wider voids but during off-road travel, it can provide a much more comfortable ride.ĪT3 has a tread design with tread blocks that are closely packed with one another, giving more contact area with the ground, increasing its dry grip. The higher built and lower rolling resistance results in better durability and longer mileages of the tire. The bold stone ejectors are the key essence for responsible rock traction along with highly optimized shoulders which allow great handling while turning in a rocky terrain. It is not viable to use these tires on icy roads as it lacks decent contact with the ground and deeper sipes which can probably cause the tire to lose traction and slip on ice. The wide grooves between its shoulder studs also provide a pathway for mud to easily pass through the tires further increasing its mud traction. Mud, soft snow, dirt, and gravel can easily be evacuated with the help of wider grooves resulting in much greater traction. The wider grooves and numerous sipes are responsible for better-wet traction as they wipe the water efficiently. The tread blocks are widely spaced decreasing its contact area with the road hence lowering its grip which results in much inferior on-road traction. P.S.The AT2 tire features a computer-optimized acoustic tread pattern with winter traction edges and multiple embedded sipes. im getting these in the popular 285/75/16, my first pair of 33's which excites me. Lastly the BFG All terrain i have noticed its a favorite on here but i just threw it in for the heck of it, i see a lot of mixed reviews on these too and they don't have the RAF Rating. That naturaly brought me to the Duratrac as well because they have the same rating and ive heard a lot of good things about the duratrac's but they are newer and dont have a tread life warranty, not good, i drive A lot so this is a concern to me. but for whatever reason it is they are rated in the extreme snow conditions by the RAF (snowflake symbol) and that's important for me. Seems like there are a lot of mixed feelings about the Grabber At2, people either claim they are the BFG with better pricing or they are a lesser expensive knock off. I've done a lot of research and as a result it got me absolutely no where. Alright I would like to start this debate as i have to make up my mind very quickly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |